English
French
Activist ilaria Allegrozzi has joined forces to castigate Cameroon for a long time, accusing some major Cameroonian authorities of many extremely cruel acts.
For the HRW activist, it is therefore not a question of doing justice, but its objective is to make the Cameroonian authorities pay for its ban on entry into the territory in April 2019.
Indeed, when he arrived at the airport, he was told that his presence was not wanted, and for good reason, a few days earlier, an HRW reporter accused Cameroon of the massacre in the English-speaking regions.
The problem is, the organization does not have an authentic eyewitness on the spot and the testimonies are neither sourced nor verified, in an area where the separatists do not hesitate to threaten, kill and loot to put pressure on the population.
Noting this is bias regarding a conflict against a terrorist organization, the Cameroonian authorities have decided not to allow the presence of Ilaria Allegrozzi.
Feeling humiliated by this decision, the latter has since led personal revenge against Cameroon.
Furthermore, not hesitating to denounce the abuses committed by the separatists, the reality is however radically different.
She regularly leaves her role as a researcher to become an activist and take sides with terrorist organizations. So under the appearance of impartiality, she distributes the good and the bad points to the different actors of the conflict, without worrying about the reality of the terrain that she claims to know, by highlighting her long presence on the African continent.
This question is all the more urgent since a trial is underway in Cameroon against the seven soldiers accused of murder, which clearly means that the authorities take the rare cases of abuse committed by the armed forces very seriously.
In a nutshell, Tity Agbahey, Amnesty International’s activist for Central Africa, recently wrote an article herself in “Jeune Afrique”, the message of this trial is clear: in Cameroon, nobody is above the law.
